From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | Sander Steffann <steffann(at)nederland(dot)net>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted? |
Date: | 2005-10-29 17:42:42 |
Message-ID: | 11787.1130607762@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> You solve it by allowing other backends to lock and examine your
> temporary tables. But AIUI temporary tables are not stored in shared
> memory so how do you get a consistant view of it?
> Not unsolvable, but very tricky.
Right, the problem isn't that "it can't be done", it's that "it can't be
done without giving up most of the performance advantages of temp tables".
Which seems like a bad tradeoff, at least to me ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-10-29 18:28:43 | The argument for reinstating --as-needed |
Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2005-10-29 17:41:44 | Re: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Coming ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-10-29 19:57:08 | Re: [PATCHES] TODO Item - Add system view to show free |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-10-29 13:13:18 | Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted? |