Re: [PATCHES] TODO Item - Add system view to show free

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] TODO Item - Add system view to show free
Date: 2005-10-29 19:57:08
Message-ID: 1130615828.8300.1295.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 18:43 +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 05:05:25PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > 3. Helping Readahead efficiency: Currently blocks are allocated one at a
> > time. If many tables are extending at the same time, the blocks from
> > multiple tables will be intermixed together on the disk. Reading the
> > data back takes more head movement and reduces the I/O rate. Allocating
>
> Ok, I agree with the rest but this isn't true. Any filesystem designed
> in the last ten years leaves gaps around the place so when you extend a
> file it remains consecutive. Some filesystems (like XFS) take it to
> extremes). Interleaving blocks with this pattern hasn't been done since
> FAT.
>
> That isn't to say that preextending isn't a good idea. With my pread()
> patch it was the one use of lseek() I couldn't remove.
>
> Other than that, good thought...

Thanks. I wasn't aware of that.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-29 22:51:57 Re: [ADMIN] Fatal error
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-29 19:16:10 Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Seltenreich 2005-10-30 01:51:52 typo in psql-ref
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-29 17:42:42 Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?