Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml
Date: 2007-04-24 18:57:28
Message-ID: 1177441048.16415.234.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
BTW, context diffs (diff -c) are preferred. For SGML patches, unified
diffs (diff -u) are okay as well.

On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 16:10 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> This patch adds a sentence on monitoring.sgml explaining that 
> stats_row_level needs to be enabled if user wants to get last 
> vacuum/analyze execution time.

Why is this so? It sounds more like a bug than a feature to me.


In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2007-04-24 21:09:47
Subject: Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2007-04-22 14:10:51
Subject: Patch for monitoring.sgml

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-04-24 19:54:49
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Email signature in release announcement posting
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-04-24 18:40:49
Subject: Re: RETURN QUERY in PL/PgSQL?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group