Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml
Date: 2007-04-24 18:57:28
Message-ID: 1177441048.16415.234.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

BTW, context diffs (diff -c) are preferred. For SGML patches, unified
diffs (diff -u) are okay as well.

On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 16:10 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> This patch adds a sentence on monitoring.sgml explaining that
> stats_row_level needs to be enabled if user wants to get last
> vacuum/analyze execution time.

Why is this so? It sounds more like a bug than a feature to me.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2007-04-24 21:09:47 Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml
Previous Message Guillaume Lelarge 2007-04-22 14:10:51 Patch for monitoring.sgml

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-04-24 19:54:49 Re: [HACKERS] Email signature in release announcement posting
Previous Message Neil Conway 2007-04-24 18:40:49 Re: RETURN QUERY in PL/PgSQL?