From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: log_autovacuum |
Date: | 2007-04-17 20:48:48 |
Message-ID: | 1176842929.3635.520.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches pgsql-www |
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 16:41 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > BTW, shouldn't the log entry distinguish whether this was VACUUM,
> > ANALYZE, or both?
>
> We don't actually log anything for ANALYZE (the logging code is in
> lazy_vacuum_rel).
When ANALYZE starts taking some time, we can log it.
> Maybe it should be in autovacuum.c.
Well, I figured if it was the right place for VACUUM it was good enough
for autovacuum too.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-17 22:18:04 | Re: log_autovacuum |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-17 20:41:09 | Re: log_autovacuum |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-17 22:18:04 | Re: log_autovacuum |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-17 20:41:09 | Re: log_autovacuum |