From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Second call for platform testing |
Date: | 2001-11-30 23:06:14 |
Message-ID: | 11748.1007161574@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> writes:
> A little experimentation shows that "geometry-solaris-precision.out" is
> a perfect match. Two questions:
Excellent.
> 1. Do we use "geometry-solaris-precision.out", or clone it with a more
> appropriate name like "geometry-hpux11.out" or
> "geometry-hpux-precision.out"?
I'd use it as-is. Not worth the trouble to rename it, and we definitely
don't want to carry around two copies.
> 2. The current resultmap says: "geometry/hppa=geometry-positive-zeros".
> What do we modify to so that it differentiates between HPUX11 and
> HPUX10? I see it's related to the config.guess output and the pg_regress
> script, but it's not clear to me where to make a change.
Looks like it's got to be
geometry/hppa-hp-hpux9=geometry-positive-zeros
geometry/hppa-hp-hpux10=geometry-positive-zeros
geometry/hppa-hp-hpux11=geometry-solaris-precision
Ugh, but ...
Please check that's OK on 11, and I'll double check it on 10.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Buttafuoco | 2001-11-30 23:20:22 | Re: 7.2beta3 on Digital Alpha |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-11-30 22:49:09 | Re: Second call for platform testing |