Re: Second call for platform testing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org
Subject: Re: Second call for platform testing
Date: 2001-11-30 23:06:14
Message-ID: 11748.1007161574@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> writes:
> A little experimentation shows that "geometry-solaris-precision.out" is
> a perfect match. Two questions:

Excellent.

> 1. Do we use "geometry-solaris-precision.out", or clone it with a more
> appropriate name like "geometry-hpux11.out" or
> "geometry-hpux-precision.out"?

I'd use it as-is. Not worth the trouble to rename it, and we definitely
don't want to carry around two copies.

> 2. The current resultmap says: "geometry/hppa=geometry-positive-zeros".
> What do we modify to so that it differentiates between HPUX11 and
> HPUX10? I see it's related to the config.guess output and the pg_regress
> script, but it's not clear to me where to make a change.

Looks like it's got to be

geometry/hppa-hp-hpux9=geometry-positive-zeros
geometry/hppa-hp-hpux10=geometry-positive-zeros
geometry/hppa-hp-hpux11=geometry-solaris-precision

Ugh, but ...

Please check that's OK on 11, and I'll double check it on 10.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Buttafuoco 2001-11-30 23:20:22 Re: 7.2beta3 on Digital Alpha
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-11-30 22:49:09 Re: Second call for platform testing