Re: [PATCH] Suppress Clang 3.9 warnings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Suppress Clang 3.9 warnings
Date: 2017-02-20 15:37:41
Message-ID: 11741.1487605061@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> In theory - could we just always use our internal strl* implementations?

Hmm, maybe configure's test to see if a declaration has been provided
is going wrong? I notice that anchovy, which is supposedly current
Arch Linux, doesn't think the platform has it:

checking whether strlcat is declared... no
checking whether strlcpy is declared... no
...
checking for strlcat... no
checking for strlcpy... no

But that's using gcc. Perhaps clang behaves differently?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2017-02-20 15:38:23 Re: Provide list of subscriptions and publications in psql's completion
Previous Message Jim Mlodgenski 2017-02-20 15:06:25 mat views stats