Re: scan_recycle_buffers

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: scan_recycle_buffers
Date: 2007-03-10 07:59:55
Message-ID: 1173513595.3641.386.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 18:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 16:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> We do that anyway; but certainly Simon's patch ought not be injecting
> >> an additional one.
>
> > It should be possible to pass that down from the planner to the
> > executor, in certain cases.
>
> Huh? See HeapScanDesc->rs_nblocks.

Many thanks.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-03-10 08:05:28 Re: Bug in VACUUM FULL ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-10 05:56:07 Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-03-10 08:48:31 Re: scan_recycle_buffers
Previous Message NikhilS 2007-03-10 05:13:12 Re: Auto creation of Partitions