Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulk operationsavoiding WAL

From: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulk operationsavoiding WAL
Date: 2007-03-09 17:06:47
Message-ID: 1173460007.9058.93.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 17:47, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't think that people are very likely to need to turn archiving on
> and off on-the-fly.

We did need occasionally to turn archiving on on-the-fly. It did happen
that I started up a new DB machine and I did not have yet the log
archive available, so I had to wait with configuring that, but the
machine went on-line before the archive machine was ready... and then
later I had to switch on archiving. It was very convenient that I could
do it without a restart.

It's true that has been rare occasion, more often you just need to
change the archive command (e.g. to archive to a different location if
the archive repository goes down).

It's somewhat moot for us as we changed to use Slony (which is a heavy
beast but once it works it's great).

Cheers,
Csaba.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2007-03-09 17:33:38 Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2007-03-09 17:02:21 Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulk operationsavoiding WAL