Re: Why can't I put a BEFORE EACH ROW trigger on a view?

From: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
To: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why can't I put a BEFORE EACH ROW trigger on a view?
Date: 2007-02-25 02:48:04
Message-ID: 1172371684l.30468l.12l@mofo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On 02/24/2007 08:30:21 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> How is it that the rules
> can come up with NEW and OLD for a view and why wouldn't
> something be able to give triggers the same data.

Ah, NEW and OLD are only good in the WHERE part
of the rule, which is still in "query land"
country before execution starts.

At this point my ignorance is blinding me.
Couldn't the backend somehow use the SELECT
rule to produce and iterate over what's to
be modified so there'd be something to have
for OLD? Merge the WHERE part of the query
plan for the modification with the underlying
WHERE part? Likewise for NEW?

It must do something like that for the WHERE
part of the rule to get NEW and OLD.

Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-25 02:55:40 Re: Why can't I put a BEFORE EACH ROW trigger on a view?
Previous Message Karl O. Pinc 2007-02-25 02:30:21 Re: Why can't I put a BEFORE EACH ROW trigger on a view?