RE: [HACKERS] Keyword

From: "Meskes, Michael" <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de>, "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Keyword
Date: 1998-03-14 18:20:39
Message-ID: 11720CEF3853D011AC0C00A024B7A9E110A174@einstein.topsystem.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wholeheartly agree. AFAIK it does nothing else, but ORACLE likes it.
And most users have experience in ORACLE.

Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager | topystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes(at)debian(dot)org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44

> ----------
> From: Thomas G. Lockhart[SMTP:lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu]
> Sent: Freitag, 13. März 1998 16:04
> To: Michael Meskes
> Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Keyword
>
> > I'm currently trying to get ecpg more in line with the backends
> > parser. Doing so I found ecpg accepts a syntax the backend doesn't.
> > It's 'commit work release' which is accepted for compatibility with
> > Oracle. How about allowing this in the backend, too?
>
> I don't want to sound too fussy here, but does this statement provide
> any functionality missing from the SQL92 syntax 'commit [work]'? If
> not,
> then perhaps Oracle users could start writing portable code if they
> cared to?
>
> - Tom
>

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Meskes, Michael 1998-03-14 18:20:41 RE: AW: [HACKERS] Begin statement again
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-03-14 17:15:46 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?