Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Freezing is not WAL-logged

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Freezing is not WAL-logged
Date: 2006-10-19 19:14:48
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I just noticed that freezing a tuple (in vacuumlazy.c) is not 
> WAL-logged.

The theory is that this doesn't matter because the tuple is committed
either way ... it's equivalent to a hint-bit update which we don't
WAL-log either.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-10-19 19:22:04
Subject: Re: Freezing is not WAL-logged
Previous:From: Cristian IonescuDate: 2006-10-19 07:34:30
Subject: hello

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group