Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

On Jan 19 2006, 9:36 pm, l(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)lerctr(dot)org ("Larry Rosenman") wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Larry Rosenman" <lrosen(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> >> I've got a fastFreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm
> >> on.
>
> >> However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.
>
> >> My questions are:
> >> 1) do we need another one?
> >> 2) if yes, what options need coverage?
>
> > Looks like we're fairly well covered onfreebsdalready. Are you
> > willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?
>
> Not particularly, as I want it to do other things. However, I might be
> willing
> To get VMWare running on it, and run something else in a VM.
>
> What were you thinking?

FreeBSD 6.2 was just released. I don't see any coverage for it yet.