Re: jdbc pg_hba.conf error

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Bhavana(dot)Rakesh" <Bhavana(dot)Rakesh(at)noaa(dot)gov>
Cc: chris smith <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: jdbc pg_hba.conf error
Date: 2007-05-31 20:07:25
Message-ID: 11708.1180642045@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Bhavana.Rakesh" <Bhavana(dot)Rakesh(at)noaa(dot)gov> writes:
> Here's what happens when I specify the port number

> [brakesh(at)lnx383 ~]$ psql -U brakesh -p 5000 -h 127.0.0.1 -d testing123
> psql: could not connect to server: Connection refused
> Is the server running on host "127.0.0.1" and accepting
> TCP/IP connections on port 5000?

5000 being a nonstandard port number, it's certainly possible that the
kernel is filtering this connection attempt. "Connection refused" might
mean either that there's no process listening to TCP port 5000, or that
the kernel rejected the connection before looking for a listening process.

In any case it seems highly probable that you do have two postmasters
running on this machine, one at port 5000 and one at port 5432. The
psql calls without an explicit -p switch would have defaulted to port
5432 unless you've done something strange to your installation.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2007-05-31 20:20:09 Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
Previous Message Vivek Khera 2007-05-31 20:04:42 Re: Performance