| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Steve <cheetah(at)tanabi(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |
| Date: | 2007-04-13 02:40:14 |
| Message-ID: | 11705.1176432014@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-performance |
Steve <cheetah(at)tanabi(dot)org> writes:
> Okay -- I started leaving indexes on one by one.
> ...
> .... So does this mean I should experiment with dropping those indexes?
No, I think this means there's a planner bug to fix. I haven't quite
scoped out what it is yet, though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-04-13 03:29:56 | Re: Benchmarking tools for the Postgres, EDB and Oracle Database |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-04-13 00:58:03 | Re: Minor changes to Recovery related code |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-13 03:49:54 | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-04-13 00:58:03 | Re: Minor changes to Recovery related code |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-04-13 02:50:08 | Re: Question about memory allocations |
| Previous Message | Steve | 2007-04-13 00:34:18 | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |