Re: pg_standby

From: Doug Knight <dknight(at)wsi(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_standby
Date: 2007-02-02 14:49:23
Message-ID: 1170427763.10933.60.camel@arc-dknightlx.wsicorp.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Not at all, in fact I was planning on using the infinite wait, and using
something like heartbeat to force creation of the trigger file in the
event the primary dies. Thanks Simon!

Doug

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 14:38 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 15:14 -0500, Doug Knight wrote:
>
> > Quick question on the -w option; setting it to zero "disables", do you
> > mean it waits until the file appears or a trigger file appears, or it
> > just doesn't wait at all?
>
> It means it waits forever, or until a trigger file appears - but a
> trigger file is optional, so its possible to create an awkward
> situation. I'm not happy with that default, but feedback from Merlin
> suggested production problems with people not understanding that.
>
> I'm happy to change to whatever consensus is, so if you think that's
> dumb, just shout.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-02 14:52:08 Re: Function proposal to find the type of a datum
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-02-02 14:38:44 Re: pg_standby

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2007-02-02 15:54:44 Re: Enums patch v2
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-02-02 14:38:44 Re: pg_standby