On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 21:33 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > Why would we want to have two redundant copies of the same
> > > information?
> > The lock information is not available anywhere in the form of a
> > matrix.
> But it will be. A patch for the documentation has been proposed.
Cool. When that's done, we probably don't need the code version.
Would've been helpful if you'd explained what you meant... not many
people read all posts on all lists.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-01-30 22:50:26|
|Subject: Re: BUG #2913: Subscript on multidimensional array
yields no value|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2007-01-30 20:33:26|
|Subject: Re: Lock compatibility matrix|