| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Lock compatibility matrix |
| Date: | 2007-01-30 20:45:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1170189900.3681.238.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 21:33 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > Why would we want to have two redundant copies of the same
> > > information?
> >
> > The lock information is not available anywhere in the form of a
> > matrix.
>
> But it will be. A patch for the documentation has been proposed.
Cool. When that's done, we probably don't need the code version.
Would've been helpful if you'd explained what you meant... not many
people read all posts on all lists.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-30 22:50:26 | Re: BUG #2913: Subscript on multidimensional array yields no value |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-01-30 20:33:26 | Re: Lock compatibility matrix |