Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb
Date: 2003-11-14 17:21:36
Message-ID: 117.1068830496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> darnit!
> patch attached.

Applied with correction (you got the return-value check backwards)
and further work to deal reasonably with error conditions occurring
in check_data_dir.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-14 17:23:21 Re: heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-11-14 17:03:59 Re: cvs head? initdb?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-14 17:23:21 Re: heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-14 16:51:44 Re: ALTER TABLE modifications