Quick Links

Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc:	"Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb
Date:	2003-11-14 17:21:36
Message-ID:	117.1068830496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> darnit!
> patch attached.

Applied with correction (you got the return-value check backwards)
and further work to deal reasonably with error conditions occurring
in check_data_dir.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb at 2003-11-14 06:57:36 from Andrew Dunstan

Responses

Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new at 2003-11-14 17:35:08 from Bruce Momjian
Re: [HACKERS] heads up -- subtle change of behavior of at 2003-11-14 17:50:25 from Andrew Dunstan

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Andrew Dunstan	2003-11-14 17:23:21	Re: heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb
Previous Message	Jan Wieck	2003-11-14 17:03:59	Re: cvs head? initdb?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Andrew Dunstan	2003-11-14 17:23:21	Re: heads up -- subtle change of behavior of new initdb
Previous Message	Peter Eisentraut	2003-11-14 16:51:44	Re: ALTER TABLE modifications