Re: Issue on catalogs.sgml

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issue on catalogs.sgml
Date: 2021-05-24 22:05:55
Message-ID: 1168380.1621893955@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> writes:
> While working on the french translation of the manual, I found that one
> column of pg_stats_ext was on the pg_stats columns' list. Here is a quick
> patch to fix this.

Right you are, and after casting a suspicious eye on the responsible
commit, I found another similar error. "patch" with the default
amount of context is not too bright about handling our documentation
tables :-(.

Pushed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-05-24 22:30:13 Re: Performance degradation of REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-05-24 20:44:30 Re: CALL versus procedures with output-only arguments