| From: | "Jeremy Haile" <jhaile(at)fastmail(dot)fm> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: vacuum v. vacuumdb |
| Date: | 2007-01-05 21:09:08 |
| Message-ID: | 1168031348.15880.283344697@webmail.messagingengine.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Nope - the other way around. The vacuumdb tool simply executes the
VACUUM command through postmaster.
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:05:44 -0600, "Erik Jones" <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> said:
> Quick question, when running a VACUUM query through the postmaster,
> does it use the external vacuumdb tool?
>
> --
> erik jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
> software development
> emma(r)
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Hamill | 2007-01-05 21:14:55 | Re: vacuum v. vacuumdb |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Haile | 2007-01-05 21:08:03 | Re: Database versus filesystem for storing images |