From: | Ragnar <gnari(at)hive(dot)is> |
---|---|
To: | ALVARO ARCILA <arcila_alvaro(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: max_fsm_pages and check_points |
Date: | 2006-12-20 09:01:28 |
Message-ID: | 1166605288.6369.274.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On mið, 2006-12-20 at 05:31 +0000, ALVARO ARCILA wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> I've looking around the log files of my server and lately they
> indicate that I should consider increase the check_point segments
> because they're beeing reading too often and also recommend increasing
> the max_fsm_pages over 169728...
if this has been happening for some time, some tables
might possibly have become bloated with dead rows, so
a one-time VACUUM FULL or CLUSTER on these might be indicated
to speed up reaching the steady state.
I think the max_fsm_pages is a minimum recommendation, so you
might want to look at VACUUM VERBOSE output after setting it,
to see if an even higher value is indicated
> those are the config values present in the postgresql.conf
>
> shared_buffers = 1000
> work_mem = 8192
if you have got a lot of memory, you might want to experiment
with these a little
gnari
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steinar H. Gunderson | 2006-12-20 11:00:07 | Re: GROUP BY vs DISTINCT |
Previous Message | Brian Herlihy | 2006-12-20 07:19:39 | GROUP BY vs DISTINCT |