From: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | carmoda(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: anyone got any suggestions for clustering? |
Date: | 2006-12-19 07:00:16 |
Message-ID: | 1166511616.3173.16.camel@laptop.gunduz.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 16:47 +1000, CARMODA wrote:
> I am currently investigating the preferred method of clustering a
> postgresql database on Redhat?
<snip>
> we already have licences for Redhat Enterprise Linux ES v4, i was
> wondering if Redhat's Cluster Manager is a candidate?
Using RHEL + RHCS + GFS, you can setup an active/passive clustering. I
have presented this setup in PostgreSQL Summit:
http://www.gunduz.org/download.php?dlid=142
> or if either PGCluster or Slony1 have advantages or drawbacks etc.
Slony-I is also a good choice for replication. You can use pgpool as a
frontend to Slony-I, if you want. I don't think that pgCluster will act
well under high load (well, it is more than a "thought"...) So, I'd
ignore pgCluster for now and go on with Slony-I and/or RHCS.
Also you may want to take a look at this:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/high-availability.html
Regards,
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shane Ambler | 2006-12-19 07:08:17 | Re: Let's play bash the search engine |
Previous Message | CARMODA | 2006-12-19 06:47:21 | anyone got any suggestions for clustering? |