| From: | "Arthur Ward" <award(at)dominionsciences(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joe Conway" <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart |
| Date: | 2004-03-17 15:40:35 |
| Message-ID: | 11658.68.62.129.152.1079538035.squirrel@award.gotdns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
> The problem with Jan's more complex version of the patch (at least the
> one I found - perhaps not the right one) is it includes a bunch of other
> experimental stuff that I'd not want to mess with at the moment. Would
> changing the input units (for the original patch) from milli-secs to
> micro-secs be a bad idea? If so, I guess I'll get to extracting what I
> need from Jan's patch.
Jan's vacuum-delay-only patch that nobody can find is here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-11/msg00518.php
I've been using it in testing & production without any problems.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-17 16:02:38 | Re: COPY formatting |
| Previous Message | Fernando Nasser | 2004-03-17 15:11:48 | Re: COPY formatting |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rosser Schwarz | 2004-03-17 17:33:31 | Re: atrocious update performance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-17 15:16:39 | Re: atrocious update performance |