Re: Switching to XML

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
Date: 2006-12-10 17:51:28
Message-ID: 1165773088.13210.62.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs


> > Until you can come up with a reason why we *shouldn't* move to XML. I
> > believe this issue is settled.
>
> I have previously listed the issues in favor and against. Check the
> start of this thread.

The only thing I see is that you don't want to move because all the
tools that are available for docbook sgml are also available for docbook
xml.

Am I missing anything?

Joshua D. Drake

>
--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-12-10 18:07:10 Re: Switching to XML
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-10 17:42:00 Re: Switching to XML