| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql possible TODO |
| Date: | 2006-12-05 22:43:44 |
| Message-ID: | 1165358624.31648.85.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > It's like a part of bash that's been obsolete since readline was
> > written, and probably would never have existed at all if readline had
> > appeared first. I can't really picture a situation in which this is an
> > improvement over the readline facilities.
>
> Yea, that was my impression. It seemed so awkward, but so is 'vi' to
> me. (Me ducks.)
Well you won't get any argument from me about vi ;) but as others have
already mentioned, it is useful to some.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-12-05 22:45:13 | Re: psql possible TODO |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-12-05 22:43:04 | Re: psql possible TODO |