From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RC1 blocker issues |
Date: | 2006-11-24 22:05:03 |
Message-ID: | 1164405903.3841.716.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 12:37 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 02:48:22PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I wrote:
> > > * possible rearrangement of pg_stat column order:
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00643.php
> > > Should we do this, and if so should we force initdb (via a
> > > catversion change)? I'm currently leaning to the thought that if
> > > we change it we should force initdb, else we'll risk having a
> > > noticeable user-visible difference between different "8.2"
> > > installations.
> >
> > Actually, on looking closer, we *must* force initdb because this
> > changes the expected output for the rules regression test.
> >
> > So, yea or nay? I'm working up the patch right now, but will hold
> > off applying until I hear some comments.
>
> +1 on applying it. Beta testers should understand what "beta" and
> "test" mean. :)
Yes, I would like to rearrange the columns.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-11-24 22:07:07 | Re: RC1 blocker issues |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-24 21:10:58 | Re: Weird behavior in psql with \copy |