Re: SPF Record ...

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPF Record ...
Date: 2006-11-18 21:09:54
Message-ID: 1163884194.22477.0.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


> > O.k. and is OpenSPF the definitive source for information on it?
>
> I do not know who is the definite source.
>
> > Honestly, the whole thing sounds pretty pointless at least at this
> > juncture. I am not bashing the technology but I don't really see a
> > reason for it.
>
> Good! Then you'd agree, there's no harm in publishing our SPF
> records vis DNS and letting others use it.

My only argument would be *if* there is additional administrative
overhead. If not.. I a really don't care :). If Marc wants to use it,
have at it.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-11-18 21:19:43 Re: [CORE] SPF Record ...
Previous Message Dan Langille 2006-11-18 21:01:45 Re: SPF Record ...