Re: [HACKERS] Extended protocol logging

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dave Cramer" <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Extended protocol logging
Date: 2006-11-17 09:40:12
Message-ID: 1163756412.27956.575.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 18:19 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> If we document it, we have to keep it current, even if
> we improve it later.

Sounds like all the rest of the docs then...

We really need a guide to deciphering the logs, so that people can
understand how to tune things.

> I will say I had trouble testing this logging
> because it requires a C program to use that protocol. Here is the test
> program I used.

Thanks, I'll look into this.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergio 2006-11-17 10:54:54 Client SSL validation using root.crt
Previous Message Mario Weilguni 2006-11-17 08:50:33 Re: Cast null to int4 upgrading from Version 7.2

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-17 13:25:47 Re: [PATCHES] replication docs: split single vs.
Previous Message Gleb Kouzmenko 2006-11-17 08:58:56 SSL cert client authentication