Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ?barriers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Greg Burd" <greg(at)burd(dot)me>
Cc: "Thomas Munro" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Nathan Bossart" <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, "Dave Cramer" <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ?barriers
Date: 2026-01-04 20:13:15
Message-ID: 1163226.1767557595@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Greg Burd" <greg(at)burd(dot)me> writes:
> What this patch does is get "unicorn" off the dead list, which would be nice.

Indeed ... I'm getting pretty tired of seeing unicorn cluttering
the BF failures list. Is there a reason we're still holding off
committing, other than it being holiday season?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2026-01-04 20:21:44 Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ?barriers
Previous Message Niyaz Hazigaleyev 2026-01-04 19:32:50 Re: Use Postgres as meson wrap subproject