Re: Increasing the length of pg_stat_activity.current_query...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Increasing the length of pg_stat_activity.current_query...
Date: 2004-11-06 20:53:46
Message-ID: 11627.1099774426@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
> Would you be open to increasing this further after the 8.0 release?

Nope.

> I haven't heard of anyone complaining about dropped/fragmented pgstat
> messages. :) -sc

That's because we keep 'em small enough to not fragment.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-11-06 21:24:39 Re: Increasing the length of
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-11-06 20:52:44 Re: relative_path() seems overly complicated and buggy