| From: | Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Shared Memory Hooks Documentation (was Re: New shared memory hooks proposal) |
| Date: | 2006-10-31 20:59:32 |
| Message-ID: | 1162328373.29645.17.camel@bloodnok.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 16:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure where to put it, either. Subsection 32.9.1 (Dynamic
> Loading) is pretty basic stuff for first-time C-function authors ---
> this seems off-topic for that section. Maybe a new subsection down near
> the end of 32.9? Another possibility is somewhere in the Internals
> chapters, although I don't offhand see an obvious place there either.
>
>
This patch, against xfunc.sgml, adds a new subsection 33.9.12, Shared
Memory and LWLocks in C-Language Functions, describing how shared memory
and lwlocks may be requested by C add-in functions.
I have, btw, verified that this works in the forthcoming release of
Veil.
__
Marc
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| patch_xfunc.sgml | text/x-patch | 1.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-31 21:07:31 | Re: TODO Item: IN(long list ...) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-10-31 20:45:24 | Re: TODO Item: IN(long list ...) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-10-31 21:10:31 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging freezing |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-31 20:59:17 | Alternative patches for the btree deletion issue |