Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
Date: 2021-06-18 15:24:00
Message-ID: 1162082.1624029840@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:24:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe "if true, pstmt's node tree must not be modified" ?

> Thanks, I find it way better!

OK, pushed that way, and with a couple other comment tweaks from
an additional re-reading.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo NAGATA 2021-06-18 15:46:05 Re: pgbench bug candidate: negative "initial connection time"
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-06-18 15:15:45 Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements