| From: | "korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: hstore isexists |
| Date: | 2006-10-11 19:35:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1160595300.12993.42.camel@sakai.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >> 'exists' isn't a good name for function :(.
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, that isn't going to work. Perhaps "ifexists"? Or just leave well
> > enough alone.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Darn. Can't have been thinking clearly this morning.
>
> How about "exist" (no s)?
Maybe 'found', 'present', or 'contains'? (no, I haven't checked for a
grammar conflict)
-- Korry
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2006-10-11 19:48:36 | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
| Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-10-11 19:27:19 | Re: Index Tuning Features |