Re: predefined functions

From: Rafal Pietrak <rafal(at)zorro(dot)isa-geek(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: predefined functions
Date: 2006-10-08 08:07:44
Message-ID: 1160294864.4482.36.camel@zorro.isa-geek.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 01:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah: current_user (without the parens) is specified by the SQL
> standard, but we're not about to adopt such a brain-dead syntax
> for any of the functions defined by Postgres itself --- as you

I see. One of "committee's work gems" :(

And yet, does that really imply faulting syntax on "current_user()"?

--
-R

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karsten Hilbert 2006-10-08 10:42:31 Re: Storing images in PostgreSQL databases (again)
Previous Message Eberhard Lisse 2006-10-08 07:43:38 Re: Potentially annoying question about date ranges (part 2)