From: | Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: question regarding regression tests |
Date: | 2006-09-15 22:59:12 |
Message-ID: | 1158361152.20171.11.camel@voyager.truesoftware.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you.
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 17:41 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Could someone please provide information about how to create a correct
> > regression test?
>
> Some information you can find on the PGXS docs:
>
> <para>
> The scripts listed in the <varname>REGRESS</> variable are used for
> regression testing of your module, just like <literal>make
> installcheck</literal> is used for the main
> <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> server. For this to work you need
> to have a subdirectory named <literal>sql/</literal> in your extension's
> directory, within which you put one file for each group of tests you want
> to run. The files should have extension <literal>.sql</literal>, which
> should not be included in the <varname>REGRESS</varname> list in the
> makefile. For each test there should be a file containing the expected
> result in a subdirectory named <literal>expected/</literal>, with extension
> <literal>.out</literal>. The tests are run by executing <literal>make
> installcheck</literal>, and the resulting output will be compared to the
> expected files. The differences will be written to the file
> <literal>regression.diffs</literal> in <command>diff -c</command> format.
> Note that trying to run a test which is missing the expected file will be
> reported as <quote>trouble</quote>, so make sure you have all expected
> files.
> </para>
>
> Note that not all of this applies to the backend regression tests, but
> it should help. For the backend, you list the tests in the
> serial_schedule and parallel_schedule files.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-15 22:59:54 | Re: log_duration is redundant, no? |
Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2006-09-15 22:54:59 | Re: Reducing data type space usage |