From: | Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TODO item: GUID |
Date: | 2006-09-05 13:39:59 |
Message-ID: | 1157463599.32094.7.camel@voyager.truesoftware.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Do you really want to copy the code verbatim? I mean, there's a lot of
> stuff which would need quite a bit of massaging to get working in
> postgres. I'd say just look at it, understand it, and then write
> something that will work. The copyright won't matter then.
>
This is a better idea i must say. I will take a closer look at the code
then see which parts I can reuse.
> BTW, I seem to remember something about the stuff in the RFC not being
> good for some reason, not unique enough or too predictable. Do you know
> anything about that?
>
It was a privacy issue regarding GUID generation introduced by MS. The
version 1 (V1) of the algorithm was created based on the MAC which was
somehow back-traceable to the computer it was generated on I guess.
Version 4 was based on a better algorithm.
> Have a nice day,
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-09-05 13:48:45 | Fixed length data types issue |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-09-05 13:26:26 | Re: TODO item: GUID |