Re: TODO item: GUID

From: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO item: GUID
Date: 2006-09-05 13:39:59
Message-ID: 1157463599.32094.7.camel@voyager.truesoftware.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Do you really want to copy the code verbatim? I mean, there's a lot of
> stuff which would need quite a bit of massaging to get working in
> postgres. I'd say just look at it, understand it, and then write
> something that will work. The copyright won't matter then.
>

This is a better idea i must say. I will take a closer look at the code
then see which parts I can reuse.

> BTW, I seem to remember something about the stuff in the RFC not being
> good for some reason, not unique enough or too predictable. Do you know
> anything about that?
>

It was a privacy issue regarding GUID generation introduced by MS. The
version 1 (V1) of the algorithm was created based on the MAC which was
somehow back-traceable to the computer it was generated on I guess.
Version 4 was based on a better algorithm.

> Have a nice day,

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2006-09-05 13:48:45 Fixed length data types issue
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-09-05 13:26:26 Re: TODO item: GUID