Re: OIDs (Or: another RTFM question?)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Joel Rees <joel(at)alpsgiken(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OIDs (Or: another RTFM question?)
Date: 2002-07-17 05:59:53
Message-ID: 11574.1026885593@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
>>> How much of a pain would it be to make that a 64-bit counter?
>> It'd be nontrivial, primarily because of portability issues...

> This stuff should be configurable, depending on platform support.

We do already support platforms where Datum is 64 bits because pointers
are 64 bits (eg, Alpha); on such hardware I think 64-bit OIDs would
have near-zero added execution cost. But I'm troubled by the notion of
having OID be 32 bits on some platforms and 64 on others. We have more
than enough platform-dependency issues already...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder 2002-07-17 07:14:24 Re: OIDs (Or: another RTFM question?)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-17 05:43:02 Re: Blank date field.. Help...