| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: syslog_line_prefix |
| Date: | 2009-09-28 17:44:12 |
| Message-ID: | 11569.1254159852@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribi:
>> This is the same issue already raised with respect to syslog versus
>> syslogger, ie, some people would rather lose log data than have the
>> backends block waiting for it to be written.
> That could be made configurable; i.e. let the user choose whether to
> lose messages or to make everybody wait.
Hmm, I guess I missed where you proposed an implementation that would
support that?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2009-09-28 17:44:58 | Re: Review handling of MOVE and FETCH (ToDo) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-28 17:32:21 | Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs |