| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Chad R(dot) Larson" <chad(at)eldocomp(dot)com>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)rdw(dot)ru>, Tim Barnard <tbarnard(at)povn(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime) |
| Date: | 2001-07-12 18:44:25 |
| Message-ID: | 11568.994963465@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> I notice the "urgent" item for point-in-time recovery doesn't have
>> the '-' indicating a 7.2 item.
>>
>> When is that planned?
> I hope for 7.2.
What grounds do you have for hoping that? If there's anyone working
on it, they're sure keeping a mighty low profile.
Given that we're hoping to go beta in another six weeks or so, anything
that's not got a commitment from someone now is unlikely to be finished
for 7.2. I don't believe that anything as large as PIT recovery is
going to magically appear out of the woodwork.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-12 18:48:20 | Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime) |
| Previous Message | dennis@zserve.com | 2001-07-12 18:26:41 | Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime |