Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article

From: Chris Mair <chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org>
To: Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
Date: 2006-08-28 21:05:57
Message-ID: 1156799157.4026.69.camel@dell.home.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
>
> Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article
> claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM.
> Seems a little fishy to me.

There was just one submission for PostgreSQL made by one guy who didn't
manage to finish it (c't says connection pooling didn't work).

See: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2006-06/msg00052.php

MySQL's winning submission was by a team from MySQL AB.

Enough said...

Bye,
Chris.

PS: this is, by the way a few months old, I'm wondering why MySQL
does the press release only now...

--

Chris Mair
http://www.1006.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2006-08-28 21:06:32 Re: Atomicity?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-08-28 21:04:42 Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article