Re: Precision of data types and functions

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Brandon Aiken <BAiken(at)winemantech(dot)com>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Precision of data types and functions
Date: 2006-08-28 19:31:15
Message-ID: 1156793475.10490.20.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 13:54, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> writes:
>
> > test=> create table test (a numeric(12,2));
> > CREATE TABLE
> > test=> insert into test values (123123123123123.2);
> > ERROR: numeric field overflow
> > DETAIL: The absolute value is greater than or equal to 10^14 for field
> > with precision 12, scale 2.
>
> Uhm 10^14? What version of Postgres is that?!

It was in the post, it's 7.4.12 (just upgraded it to 7.4.13, as it was
my workstation) It's the version we're stuck on for a while here work.
10^14 is just another way of saying precision 12, or somewhat close to
it.

My point being that a two+ year old version of PostgreSQL is still
superior to the latest release version of MySQL...

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jorge Godoy 2006-08-28 19:36:22 Re: Precision of data types and functions
Previous Message Jasbinder Bali 2006-08-28 19:26:55 Re: [GENERAL] Shared Objects (Dynamic loading)