| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Creation of temporary tables on read-only standby servers |
| Date: | 2010-10-22 02:13:17 |
| Message-ID: | 11555.1287713597@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Greg Stark wrote:
>> It seems to me simpler and more direct to just nail relcache
>> entries for these objects into memory and manipulate them directly.
>> They can be constructed from the global catalog tables and then
>> tweaked to point to the backend local temporary tables.
> Funny, but that is how I implemented temporary tables in 1999 and lasted
> until 2002 when schema support was added. It actually worked because
> all the lookups go through the syscache.
... and as I recall, we got rid of it principally because the temp
tables weren't visible to ordinary catalog lookups, thus breaking
all sorts of client-side logic.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-22 02:17:14 | Re: Simplifying replication |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-10-22 02:03:57 | Re: Simplifying replication |