| From: | "korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | AgentM <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Date: | 2006-08-09 14:20:31 |
| Message-ID: | 1155133231.24313.3.camel@sakai.localdomain |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > There's a LOT of unnecessary overhead in that process: having a
> > simple web app that lists who claimed what todo and when, any
> > status updates if they've voluntarily provided them, and links to
> > archive discussions, we could reduce the above to a 3-step process
> > making it vastly easier for new hackers to get started.
>
> A developers' wiki with links into the list archives would be great.
My thoughts exactly...
--
Korry Douglas korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2006-08-09 14:44:22 | how to determine which types take a length argument |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-09 14:04:48 | Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived |