| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 |
| Date: | 2004-09-20 15:02:50 |
| Message-ID: | 11547.1095692570@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com> writes:
>> PGresult *
>> PQprepare(PGconn *conn,
>> const char *stmtName,
>> const char *query,
>> int nParams,
>> const Oid *paramTypes);
> Should I go ahead and do that?
(1) What about preparing an unnamed statement ... will you allow
stmtName = NULL to mean that? (Actually it might be that stmtName = ""
will cover this, I'm too lazy to check the backend code right now.)
You do need to allow access to the unnamed statement because of
Oliver Jowett's recent efficiency hacks.
(2) What about discovering the actually resolved parameter types?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2004-09-20 15:23:37 | Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-20 14:36:34 | Re: No parameters support in "create user"? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | T E Schmitz | 2004-09-20 15:14:46 | COUNT(*) to find records which have a certain number of dependencies ? |
| Previous Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2004-09-20 14:30:00 | Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 |