| From: | "Andrew Hammond" <andrew(dot)george(dot)hammond(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication Documentation |
| Date: | 2006-08-03 18:14:04 |
| Message-ID: | 1154628844.236574.48710@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > "There are a number of different approaches to solving the problem of
> > replication, each with strengths and weaknesses. As a result, there
> > are a number of different replication solutions available for
> > PostgreSQL. To find out more, please refer to the website."
>
> Well, that's what I've been talking about all along, and it has also
> been the resolution at the Toronto meeting.
Great. Is the above text sufficient for the documentation then, or does
anyone have a suggestion on how to say this better?
Drew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2006-08-03 18:24:43 | Re: User-defined typle similar to char(length) varchar(length) |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-08-03 18:03:42 | Re: WIP archive_timeout patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-08-03 21:00:19 | Re: tg_trigtuple/tg_newtuple settings in AFTER triggers |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-08-03 18:03:42 | Re: WIP archive_timeout patch |