Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch
Date: 2006-07-28 07:36:04
Message-ID: 1154072165.2908.35.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2006-07-27 kell 22:05, kirjutas Bruce Momjian:
> Another idea Jan had today was whether we could vacuum more rows if a
> long-running backend is in serializable mode, like pg_dump.

I don't see how this gives us ability to vacuum more rows, as the
snapshot of a serializable transaction is the oldest one.

--
----------------
Hannu Krosing
Database Architect
Skype Technologies OÜ
Akadeemia tee 21 F, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia

Skype me: callto:hkrosing
Get Skype for free: http://www.skype.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Duffy 2006-07-28 07:39:02 Re: [HACKERS] putting CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in qsort_comparetup()
Previous Message Susanne Ebrecht 2006-07-28 07:30:16 Re: extension for sql update

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Duffy 2006-07-28 07:39:02 Re: [HACKERS] putting CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in qsort_comparetup()
Previous Message Susanne Ebrecht 2006-07-28 07:30:16 Re: extension for sql update