From: | Susanne Ebrecht <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: extension for sql update |
Date: | 2006-07-28 07:30:16 |
Message-ID: | 1154071816.4819.22.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Am Donnerstag, den 27.07.2006, 08:30 -0400 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Susanne Ebrecht <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de> writes:
> > ... We could provide the mixed update syntax and leave the
> > typed row value expression for the next release. Do you agree?
>
> I don't really see the point --- the patch won't provide any new
> functionality in anything like its current form, because you can
> always just write the separate expressions in the simple one to
> one way. If we do offer the row-on-the-left syntax then people
> will try to put sub-selects on the right, and won't get anything
> beyond an unhelpful "syntax error" message. So my vote would be
> to leave it alone until we have a more complete implementation.
Look at my intention, why I wrote this patch:
In recent years I migrated many customers applications from oracle or
informix to postgresql. Every time it was a very painful and annoying
job to grep through the code of functions and the whole software, to
find all updates and change them manually.
Far ago at university, I learned both syntax as standard syntax.
Example:
set a=1, b=2, c=3
and
set (a,b,c)=(1,2,3)
I admit, I prefered the second form, too, when I only used informix and
it seems also my customers do so.
Still now, I never found this syntax with select statement. I am not
sure if this is possible with informix or oracle.
regards
Susanne
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-07-28 07:36:04 | Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-07-28 07:07:05 | Re: GUC with units, details |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-07-28 07:36:04 | Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch |
Previous Message | satoshi nagayasu | 2006-07-28 06:00:18 | Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes |