| From: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GUC with units, details |
| Date: | 2006-07-27 16:07:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1154016443.22367.156.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 17:57, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> > Rounding up would have the advantage that you could just specify "0"
> > in the config file, and have postgres use the smallest value
> > possible.
>
> In most algebras, dividing zero by something is still zero, so there'd
> be no need to round anything.
I think he was refering to silently apply the minimum allowed if the
value is less than that... a lot of the settings have a minimum
allowable value. The question is if this can qualify as rounding :-)
Cheers,
Csaba.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-07-27 16:08:52 | Re: An appropriate place for UDF questions? |
| Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2006-07-27 16:04:16 | Re: GUC with units, details |