| From: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| Date: | 2006-07-11 15:49:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1152632942.5683.32.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Does our CVS setup cater for seggregated rights like this? Or
> > would that
> > be done on a trust basis?
>
> No, I don't believe you can do this with CVS at all. We'd need something
> like SVN/WebDAV to be able to grant write access just to specific parts
> of the tree to different people.
It is possible using CVS, by carefully managing file system permissions
and assigning different permissions to the OS users of the different
committers. I guess it's also possible using commit scripts... but I
don't think it worths the effort as long as there is a regular backup of
the CVS tree...
Cheers,
Csaba.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Singer | 2006-07-11 15:59:31 | Re: More nuclear options |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2006-07-11 15:48:21 | Re: More nuclear options |